Indiramma Indlu Beneficiaries Protest Reduced Bill Payment
Officials Face Complaints Over Reduced Payments in Indiramma Indlu Scheme
Beneficiaries of the Indiramma Indlu housing scheme have raised concerns over reduced final bill payments, alleging that officials released less money than promised after completion of slab construction.
Residents say the payment shortfall has caused financial difficulties, particularly for families who borrowed money to complete construction works under the housing programme.
Beneficiaries Report Payment Shortfall
Under the Indiramma Indlu housing scheme guidelines, beneficiaries are expected to receive ₹2 lakh after completing slab work during house construction.
However, beneficiaries claim that only ₹1.40 lakh has been credited to their bank accounts instead of the full amount.
Many beneficiaries say the deduction of ₹60,000 has left them struggling to continue the remaining construction work.
Six Months Waiting for the Remaining Amount
Several beneficiaries said they have been waiting for nearly six months for the remaining funds to be released.
They explained that many families had taken loans to begin construction after being assured that the full payment would be provided according to the scheme rules.
With the reduced payment, beneficiaries say they are now facing financial pressure while trying to complete pending works.
Beneficiaries Visit Offices Seeking Clarification
Residents said they have been visiting government offices repeatedly seeking clarification on the reduced payment.
They claim the remaining ₹60,000 has not been credited despite repeated requests to officials.
Beneficiaries said the delay has slowed down finishing works such as plastering, flooring, and other essential construction activities.
Demand for Immediate Release of Funds
The affected families have urged authorities to release the pending amount at the earliest so they can complete construction of their houses.
They said the Indiramma Indlu scheme was introduced to support economically weaker families in building houses.
Beneficiaries argue that withholding part of the payment defeats the purpose of the scheme and places additional financial burden on households already struggling with construction costs.
Residents have requested officials to clarify the reason for the deduction and ensure that the remaining funds are released without further delay.
