A new controversy has surfaced around YouTuber Anvesh, known online for his channel “Naa Anveshana,” after a fresh case was registered against him at the Khammam Urban Police Station. The complaint accuses him of making objectionable remarks about Hindu deities in a recently released video. According to the information given, the comments involving Sita Devi and Draupadi have triggered strong reactions and led to widespread criticism. The case was filed based on a complaint by Satyanarayana Rao from Danavaigudem village, who stated that the remarks were not only offensive but also made with the intention of hurting religious sentiments. With this development, the issue has once again placed Anvesh in the middle of a heated public debate.
This is not the first time Anvesh has faced legal trouble. Earlier, a similar case was reported in Visakhapatnam, where he was accused of making controversial statements through his videos. The repeated controversies have raised concerns about the kind of content being posted online, especially when it involves topics related to faith and belief systems. Supporters of the complainant argue that social media influence does not give creators the freedom to insult religious figures or provoke communities. They believe that accountability is necessary when content reaches large audiences and has the potential to disturb harmony.
The video that triggered the latest complaint reportedly contained remarks about Sita Devi and Draupadi that were viewed as disrespectful. Reports suggest that Anvesh allegedly used inappropriate language and references that viewers found degrading. The mention of the term “rape” connected to Draupadi in his earlier post drew strong backlash. These statements, according to critics, cross the line between personal opinion and public offense. Religious communities claim that no creator should misuse their platform to target sacred figures. Many people who saw the video expressed concern that such expressions could lead to division and encourage hate rather than discussion.
However, the situation has also sparked a conversation about creative freedom on platforms like YouTube. Some viewers argue that freedom of speech should allow questioning, analysis, or criticism of religious stories if done responsibly. They claim that legal action should not be used to silence voices but to control intentional provocation. But even those who support creative freedom acknowledge that disrespectful language or statements presented with the intention to hurt faith cannot be excused. The debate around this incident highlights the thin line between commentary and insult, a line that content creators are expected to handle with caution.
Law enforcement in Khammam has taken the complaint seriously, and an investigation is underway. The registration of the case indicates that authorities are considering the matter significant enough to evaluate. Police officials are expected to review the video, verify the complaint, and take statements from those involved. Outcomes may depend on whether the remarks fall under sections related to disturbing religious sentiments, defamation, or public disorder. The legal process could take time, but the registration of the case itself has already brought the matter into public attention.
Public reaction online continues to intensify as viewers share their views on social media platforms. Some are demanding strict action and urging authorities to set an example in order to prevent similar behavior in the future. Others are hoping for a fair investigation before judgment. The contradictory responses reflect the divided mindset of the digital audience. While one section wants accountability, another asks for balanced treatment and due process.
The repeated controversies involving Anvesh have placed him in the spotlight. As a content creator with an audience, he holds responsibility for the effect his words can have. The latest complaint has once again pushed him into the center of a sensitive conflict involving culture, faith, and freedom of expression. Whether the case will lead to major legal consequences or settle with clarification remains to be seen. For now, the situation has created widespread discussion, and the coming days are likely to determine how it progresses.
