Hyderabad Residents Protest Demolitions, Question Spending

Hyderabad: Protest Over Demolitions and Public Spending Intensifies

A group of children from families affected by the Musi and Gandhi Sarovar areas voiced strong objections over ongoing demolitions and government spending priorities. The protest centred on housing losses, civic concerns, and questions about proposed public expenditure.

The demonstrators demanded that authorities first address their housing distress before proceeding with further demolition activity. They also questioned the value of large-scale public projects while basic living concerns remain unresolved for affected families.

Children Question Housing Loss and Government Priorities

Advertisement

During the protest, the children said the impact of losing a home should be understood by decision-makers. They urged that those ordering demolitions experience the consequences faced by displaced families, highlighting the emotional and financial strain caused by the process.

They further raised objections over the proposed ₹5,000 crore spending on a Gandhi statue, questioning the long-term financial burden of such projects. The protesters said the repayment of public money, including interest, ultimately falls on citizens.

Call for Welfare Spending and Musi River Restoration

The group urged the government to prioritise welfare measures for economically weaker families. They suggested that the proposed funds could be redirected to support the poor and address housing and livelihood concerns.

The children also demanded immediate steps to clean the Musi River, stating that environmental restoration should take precedence over symbolic infrastructure projects. The protest highlighted ongoing tensions around urban development, rehabilitation, and public expenditure choices.

Administrative Focus on Development and Rehabilitation

The developments reflect continuing debates around urban planning and resettlement in Hyderabad. Issues related to rehabilitation, environmental restoration, and allocation of public funds remain central to the discussion.

Authorities have yet to issue a detailed response to the specific concerns raised by affected families, while civic and administrative processes related to redevelopment continue.